Wednesday, January 16, 2008

A Good Article on Emerging Churches

Gathering In Light (see the blog list on the right hand side) has put together a typology of emerging churches and movements. I think this is helpful and wanted to give it additional viewing so I have copied it all here. But please click in his link to read more. I find this helpful and have visited several of the churches he mentions in the last year, so it's especially helpful to me to help think through the differences I encountered along the way. Here you go:


Four Models of Emerging Churches

January 13th, 2008 · 21 Comments

four models

I’ve had a lot of vested interest in the emerging church for a number of years now, partly because of my own previous experience in communities that reflected many of the qualities present in Bolger and Gibb’s “Emerging Churches,” and partly because upon reading that book I was better able to organize my own disparate thoughts on the future of the “emerging” Friends church, or what we now convergent Friends. But there is often a too complicated debate over who and what the emerging church (EC) is, whether it is a good thing, and who really represents this “movement.” I am not really interested in defending or critiquing this movement, though I am personally in favor of at least some of the expressions within these groups, because I think the church should always be contextualizing its message the best it can. But this doesn’t really help us understand the who and the what of the EC. That said, I have been playing around with various ways of categorizing these various emerging groups, and I wanted to throw out this very early, proto-typology and see how it flies.

A Couple Disclaimers

But before I give them, let me offer a few disclaimers. First, these categories are not necessarily mutually exclusive, I’ve seen some of these groups sharing practices, and thinkers and are influenced by a variety of theological and philosophical positions. So my “proto-typology (if you will allow me the designation),” is meant to offer a really broad stroke to start a conversation, about the rich variety in this post-modern church. Hopefully, the conversation will be one that will in fact help make this list more accurate and better yet, help us be more faithful to the Gospel in our world. Second, I absolutely hate typologies. Absolutely and completely. Third, these categories are not based on new field research, but rather my own readings (and interpretations) of a variety of authors and positions. In other words, I am not trying to create a final word on this, but rather a (really) rough guide. Fourth, my stock is ultimately not in the emerging church, it is in the Quaker tradition so if anything my bias lays with the peace church.

Wow that’s a long list of disclaimers!

The way I’ve tried to construct these categories is around a) philosophers and theologians who have influenced these groups, and b) their stance towards Western culture.

Four Types of Emerging Churches and their Thinkers

  1. Deconstructionist Model: Probably the most well known group of emerging churches these churches are truly postmodern in just about every sense of the word. These are Christians influenced mainly by deconstruction, a philosophical approach invented on the continent. In their holy readings of philosophical discourse Derrida, Lyotard, Foucault and Caputo would be there. Much of the focus is on adopting postmodernity, and contextualizing the Gospel accordingly. Peter Rollins’ Ikon in Ireland would be a good example of one such group. I think Tony Jones and Brian McLaren would also fall under this category. I would say they are accommodating to postmodern culture, against modernism, and often against the institutional church making them lean towards a sort of non-denominationalism.
  2. Pre-modern/Augustinian Model: This model would be the second most influential within the EC, and can be in (friendly) opposition to the first group. Instead of understanding postmodernism in terms of Nietzschean philosophy as group one would do, this model leans more towards a Renaissance styled post-modernism (similar to what is represented in Toulmin’s Cosmopolis). Whether this group is truly early modern or whether it reaches back further to the pre-modern era I am not quite clear on, but St. Augustine and St. Thomas are key figures for this group. This is the where the Radical Orthodoxy of John Milbank, James K. Smith and others would fall. We see some catholics here, as well as other theologians that tend towards placing a higher emphasis on tradition within the overall framework of the Christian faith, rather than simply contextualization. This group would be see history as having shown us a better way, and if we reach back far enough we may be able to find wisdom that will help us in our quest of faith today. They would be more favorable towards institutional church, and have a pretty clear understanding of what kind of church we ought to become, but would also be seen as nostalgic and trying to uphold an institution that has often oppressed and violated those we are called to help.
  3. Emerging Peace Church Model (Or Open Anabaptism): This model of the emerging church stresses the non-conformist tendencies of Jesus, and thus the church should follow in his footsteps through non-violence, love of enemy and caring for the poor. This one may be closest to a kind of new monasticism that has so often been written about in recent times. While there are people from the various peace churches involved in this type of church, there are also people from a variety of traditions who are seeking to contextualize the Gospel within our culture. This group does not accept any one style of culture as being good, thus their non-conformist attitude is directed at modernity and postmodernity alike. They see Jesus (and his incarnation) as their primary model for engaging culture. They are influenced by Wittgenstein, Barth, Bonhoeffer, John H. Yoder, McClendon and Nancey Murphy to name a few. In this group you will find people like Jarrod McKenna and the Peace Tree, Shane Claiborne, some Mennonites, Rob Bell’s Mars Hill, Submergent, Jesus Radical and convergent Friends, to name a few. This group is counter any kind of Christendom styled church and thus would be sometimes for and sometimes against institutionalization, and would see contextualization as important only up to the point that it remains ultimately an extension of Jesus’ ministry and message.
  4. Foundationalist Model: This model of the emerging church is more conservative in their reading of Scripture and modern approaches to ecclesiology (standard preacher-centered teaching, music for worship, etc) while seeking to be innovative in their approaches to evangelism. This may come in the form of people meeting in pubs, having tatoos, cussing from the pulpit, playing loud rock music for worship and adding a layer of “alternative-ness” to their overall church service. These churches can be found within larger church communities, or can be on their own, sometimes as a large (possibly mega) church. They follow standard Evangelicalism in that they aren’t attach to traditions, and come out politically and theologically conservative, while maintaining a more accomodational stance toward culture in the name of evangelism, they will ultimately look similar to older church communities theologically. This is where I think Mark Driscoll, Dan Kimball, Erwin McManus and many “emerging services” within mega-church congregations like Willow Creek might be found.

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Update this week

I hope you enjoyed Harriet Harral’s time with us this past weekend.  She had a really good time with Broadus and came away very impressed with your questions and mission ventures in the local community and beyond.  Please make a note that on the weekend of April 27, Daniel Vestel, the CBF Coordinator will be with us to help wrap up the CBF Global Missions Offering Emphasis. . . You may have noticed some changes in the parking lots.  We’ve just about got them finished.  Besides handicap spots, the upper lot is still a free-for-all first come first served parking.  The main level now has two spots designated for ‘Nursery Parking’ and three designated ‘Special Needs and Guests’.  If you feel you need one of those spots, please take it.  On the lower level, we have five spots for visitors and two designated ‘elderly’.  Please use those as you see fit.  Please, when you see someone parking in a guest or visitor spot, please be sure to welcome them and walk them into the building.  Your hospitality in those first few moments speaks volumes about the kind of warm, loving church you already are.  Also note the basketball court that has been painted on the lower lot.  We’ll get a second goal up soon and have a nice place to play some hoops.  You are welcome to park within the court lines whenever you need to even though they are not marked.  See you Sunday!

 

Friday, January 11, 2008

Reading the Gospels

On Sunday we began an intense focus on what it means to follow Jesus. In other words, what does it really mean to be his disciple. This series will continue at least through Easter. Obviously if we are to know what it means to be his disciple, we need to know what Jesus was all about. The best way we know that is through the four Gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Between now and Easter, I want to encourage you to read every word of all four Gospels. If you’ve never really sat down to read the Bible like this, it might seem daunting, but you can do it. And I think you’ll really enjoy it—seeing the story of Jesus as whole and not just in scattered bits and pieces. There’s atleast a couple of ways to go about it. One is to read each of the four books in four sittings. Another way is to pace yourself through them. If you choose the latter, the following is a schedule you can follow to get you through them by March 23, Easter Sunday:

The week of:

January 13 Matthew 1-9

January 20 Matthew 10-18

January 27 Matthew 19-28

February 3 Mark 1-8

February 10 Mark 9-16

February 17 Luke 1-8

February 24 Luke 9-16

March 2 Luke 17-24

March 9 John 1-7

March 16 John 8-14

March 23 John 15-21